The Exodus was at a time when Egypt had chariots. I'll quote Exodus 23 -28 : "And the Egyptians pursued and went after them into the midst of the sea, all the Pharoahs horses, his chariots, and his horsemen. Now it came to pass, in the morning watch, that the Lord looked down upon the army of the Egyptians through the pillar of fire and cloud, and he troubled the army of the Egyptians. And he took off their chariot wheels, so that they drove them with difficulty" That mentions the fact that there was chariots and even states that God took off the chariot wheels!

Sorry, I was away for the weekend. I never said Camels came before chariots. And whos to say they didnt have camels and chariots at the same time? Are you saying you dont think there was chariots during the Exodus?

In my opinion, using Biblical quotations to "prove" a point on any subject can be very risky.
Even if one believes that the Bible is the word of God and therefore MUST be correct, one has to remember that the Bible has been written out by man--and man makes mistakes! Some monk, somewhere, laboriously copying a section of the Bible by hand, in a dark cell, may have mis-read some sentence and copied his belief--an error--into a new version that is copied, mistake and all, by some other monk later.
And let's face it--the Bible, at least the Old Testement, is a history of the Hebrew nation, and as such tells us the stories in the Bible from the Hebrew/Jewish view. Although many of the sites, for example, quoted in the Bible have been archaeologically found, many have not.
As an example, although it is not mentioned in the Bible (I don't think!), Masada existed. The remains of the city are a national treasure in Israel today, used as an example of Jewish pride and determination in the face of adversity. But the legend of an entire population committing suicide rather than accept Roman rule is just not shown by any excavation. There are no masses of graves containing men, women and children. Did it happen? Most assuredly--there are physical remains of both the city and the Roman garrison. Did it happen on the scale we are told? Probably not.
Same applies with the Bible.

FROM DOMESTICATION TO SELECTIVE BREEDING

The human-rabbit association can be traced back to the biblical era, as exemplified by passages in the books Leviticus (Lev. 11:5) and Deuteronomy (De. 14:7), which make reference to saphan, the Hebrew word for rabbit. Phoenicians seafarers discovered rabbits on the Iberian Peninsula around 1100 BC and, thinking that these were Hyraxes (also called Rock Dassies), called the land "i-shepan-im" (land of the Hyraxes). Since the Iberian Peninsula is north of Africa, relative geographic position suggests that another Punic derivation comes from sphan, "north". As the Romans adapted "i-shepan-im" to Latin, the word Hispania was created -- one of the etymological origins of Spain. In his book III the Roman geographer Strabo (ca. 64 BC - AD 21) called Spain "the land of rabbits". Later on, the Roman emperor Servius Sulpicius Galba (5 BC - AD 69), whose reign was short-lived (68-69 AD), issued a coin on which Spain is represented with a rabbit at her feet. Although semi-domestication started in the Roman period, in this initial phase rabbits were kept in large walled pens and were allowed to breed freely.

Humans started to play a direct role in the evolution of the rabbit from the sixth to the tenth centuries AD, when monks in southern France domesticated and bred rabbits under more restricted conditions [5]. Originally from the region comprised by southwestern Europe and North Africa, the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) is the ancestor of all domestic breeds. Since the sixth century, because of its sociable nature the rabbit increasingly has become integrated into human families as a domestic companion. Such human-induced selective breeding created the morphological diversity found in rabbits today. The first records describing a variety of fur colors and sizes distinct from wild breeds date from the sixteenth century. It was not until the eighteenth century that selective breeding resulted in the Angora rabbit, which has a uniquely thick and beautiful wool coat. The process of domestication carried out since the sixth century, coupled with ever increasing worldwide migration and trade, resulted in many new breeds and in the introduction of rabbits into new environments different from their place of origin. While there are well over 100 known breeds of rabbit around the world, "recognized" pedigree breeds vary from one country to another. For example, the American Rabbit Breeders Association (ARBA) "recognizes" 45 breeds in the U.S.A., with more under development.

http://www.ekac.org/gfpbunny.html#gfpbunnyanchor

I can understand your caution. Consider this:

1. If the Exodus would have occured during the reign of Ramese II when the Jews finally reached the promised land what would they have found waiting for them....more Egyptian troops. We know Egypt occupied the area on an almost continous basis from the time of Thutmose III entil around 1150.

2. Many would want you to believe that 600,000 Jews wandered around in the wilderness and left not a single trace, not even as much as a single campsite.38 of those 40 years were reputed to be at one place and yet there is not a trace that they were there.

3. Some want to put the Exodus earlier...around 2000BC. Our first mention of Isreal as a nation is the merenapth stelle in around 1207 BC. They would have you believe that isreal existed for several hundred years with no trace at all. Not a single mention of their name.