All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
 

Who is Who in the Mummy World?
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Feb 05, 2004 6:31 pm 
http://www-oi.uchicago.edu/OI/IS/WENTE/ ... Win95.html

This is one of the most interesting articles i have read in a long time about mummies! The final conclusion is that not all the Royal Cache Mummies are who they claim to be.

Towards the end of the article it states too, that Egyptian authorities are allowing the taking of DNA samples of the mummies. So that one day when DNA testing has developed further DNA testing can be done.
One day guess' may not be the only way to tell who is who in the Mummy World!

Remember the only mummy whose identification is sure is Tutankhamun.


Top
  
 

PostPosted: Fri Mar 12, 2004 5:03 pm 
Pharaoh
Offline

Joined:Mon Aug 25, 2003 5:22 am
Posts:1028
Location: Pennsylvania
That is cool!


Top
 Profile  
 

PostPosted: Sat May 08, 2004 4:16 am 
Prince/Princess
Offline

Joined:Sun Apr 18, 2004 7:13 pm
Posts:324
Location: N.S.W Austalia
There is a chance that the person could have been buried under the wrong name BUT shouldnt the persons (expecialy the royaltys) cartouche stated their true name, however, wouldnt the respect of the dead prevented them being incorrectly buried in the first place?

this is simply backing up the fact that if their is a cartouche you could be pretty sure of who it is, though DNA testing would be alot better way of knowing to my line of thought,


Top
 Profile  
 

PostPosted: Mon May 10, 2004 8:28 am 
Pharaoh
Offline

Joined:Thu Feb 19, 2004 11:24 pm
Posts:579
Location: Rome, Georgia USA
Tash wrote:
There is a chance that the person could have been buried under the wrong name BUT shouldnt the persons (expecialy the royaltys) cartouche stated their true name, however, wouldnt the respect of the dead prevented them being incorrectly buried in the first place?

this is simply backing up the fact that if their is a cartouche you could be pretty sure of who it is, though DNA testing would be alot better way of knowing to my line of thought,


You're right Tash, if the purpose of the reburials was to protect the royal dead. There is evidence that the true purpose of the reburials was to obtain the wealth of the buried royals. This evidence being the later reuse of coffins, and grave goods by those Pharaohs alive during the reburials. The lack of jewels and grave goods of the reburied royals in their new resting place. Given that what was really happening was offical robbery of the dead it isn't surprizing that some indentities might have been mixed up.


Top
 Profile  
 

PostPosted: Fri May 14, 2004 1:24 pm 
Pharaoh
Offline

Joined:Sat Mar 13, 2004 1:49 pm
Posts:914
Location: Long Beach, CA
A lot of the royal mummies, when gathered together for a "cache" by the priests in the later dynasties, were very damaged and were re-wrapped.
There is evidence that the priests made errors in assigning various names. True, the burial goods were taken from them. But there is no evidence that it was still intact in the person's own tomb and were taken by the priests. In fact, most of the grave-goods were already missing, having been robbed from the tombs previously.
Groups of mummies were gathered by the priests, re-wrapped if necessary, and hidden away to preserve them.


Top
 Profile  
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


  Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Style by web designer custom , optymalizacja seo pozycjonowanie stron pozycjonowanie
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group