All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 78 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 

Author Message
PostPosted: Fri May 13, 2005 3:18 am 
Pharaoh
Offline

Joined:Fri Jul 02, 2004 1:10 pm
Posts:947
Location: London, England
Exactly, that is the reason I haven't bothered to write an answer to Claude II's post, frankly I can't be bothered to argue against a brick wall and am fed up with being accused of all manner of horrible things. The answer to solve a row Claude is to drop it completely, not try and carry it on hoping it might "resolve itself".


Top
 Profile  
 

PostPosted: Fri May 13, 2005 5:06 am 
Pharaoh
Offline

Joined:Mon May 09, 2005 9:22 am
Posts:574
Location: The palace of Tutness!
Doesn't it strike you as odd that the topic has rather "drifted" a bit? :shock: As far as I've read, this group is a civil one (Which is a major relief!). I don't like fights, and I hope Cluade II can see that not everyone on here likes to discuss a matter in which people CAN get offended by some things, and thier opinons are thiers, regardless. Actions speak louder than words, but in the case of the internet, typing speaks louder than words. ^_^; Heh heh.
As for me, the topic: Zahi Hawass means to do well, though he tends to have a big head sometimes, I think he's a self-confident and self-assured man and a well-respected Egyptologist (Honestly...I'm trying to settle this conflict by talking about something else, which is what the forum topic was. Though, I fear this may not work, and I want this to be as peacefull as humanly possible. ^_^; ).


Top
 Profile  
 

PostPosted: Sat May 14, 2005 12:53 pm 
Pharaoh
Offline

Joined:Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:04 am
Posts:705
Location: Valle d'Aosta- Italy
oh, dear! You are completely right and think I am responsible as well as Claude....I apologise!
It's nice that we can have somebody sensitive like you are!!
:wink: ....you've got the right feeling! :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 

PostPosted: Sat May 14, 2005 2:13 pm 
Pharaoh
Offline

Joined:Mon May 09, 2005 9:22 am
Posts:574
Location: The palace of Tutness!
maatkara wrote:
oh, dear! You are completely right and think I am responsible as well as Claude....I apologise!
It's nice that we can have somebody sensitive like you are!!
:wink: ....you've got the right feeling! :wink:


Sensitive...? Really?! :D Well, thanks...I just didn't want an all-out brawl to start. And at least you didn't go and insult people on here, you know? You need not apologise... ^_^ If someone is to criticise anyone on here, it should be constructive, not DEstructive. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 

PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2005 12:49 am 
Prince/Princess
Offline

Joined:Sun Apr 10, 2005 2:45 am
Posts:211
Location: Roma, Italy
I agree on what you say: my friend maatkara didnt't ever insult anyone here :wink: ; besides, critics must be CONstructive...


Top
 Profile  
 

PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2005 2:21 am 
Pharaoh
Offline

Joined:Thu Sep 09, 2004 9:00 am
Posts:912
Location: England
I quite agree. In fact I think that the title of this thread was itself counter-productive.


Top
 Profile  
 

PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2005 4:11 am 
Pharaoh
Offline

Joined:Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:04 am
Posts:705
Location: Valle d'Aosta- Italy
:oops: wow! thank you so much to you all! :oops:


Top
 Profile  
 

PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2005 8:30 am 
Gods/Goddesses
Offline

Joined:Fri Nov 22, 2002 1:08 am
Posts:1262
Location: In the throne of Nephthys
*sigh* TOPIC. No more flaming. The next one who flames gets on my bad list and this topic will be closed after that.


Top
 Profile  
 

PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2005 8:41 am 
Pharaoh
Offline

Joined:Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:04 am
Posts:705
Location: Valle d'Aosta- Italy
Psus!
I think that it is not the title of the topic but the way it has turned....we all should try to respect the other :wink:

Anyway, I started the topic proposing an article in which Doctor Saleh was arguing with Hawass..By that time they still had to decide who was going to take part of the Scientific Team....now the game is over: tests on Tut are already done, and other themes are now going on about ..."Arguing with Hawass...."...
I believe that we should wonder why they didn't make a DNA test on King Tut's Mummy and toxic (?) test to see if he was poisoned....but this matter is already treated in other topics.... :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 

PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2005 9:25 am 
Pharaoh
Offline

Joined:Mon May 09, 2005 9:22 am
Posts:574
Location: The palace of Tutness!
^_^ I'm glad that all is well now. Flames are definately NOT welcome. It can be peacefull, now. And I'm happy everyone is in agreement that criticism should always be constructive. I hate it when all people are insulted. I just wonder, to reply to maatkara's point, if Tut's mummy should've had a DNA test...or something like that. :D


Top
 Profile  
 

PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2005 9:41 am 
Pharaoh
Offline

Joined:Sat Feb 26, 2005 12:36 pm
Posts:606
Location: Saqqara... someday...
Well, it might be interesting, but what would it prove? That Tut has CG AT thingies? ...Perhaps they could start a worldwide search for "Tut's lost kin" ..? :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 

PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2005 10:22 am 
Pharaoh
Offline

Joined:Mon May 09, 2005 9:22 am
Posts:574
Location: The palace of Tutness!
Unas wrote:
Well, it might be interesting, but what would it prove? That Tut has CG AT thingies? ...Perhaps they could start a worldwide search for "Tut's lost kin" ..? :wink:


:lol: Well, you never know, Unas. I just hope they settle the conflict when it comes to Tut's family and such. ^_^;


Top
 Profile  
 

PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2005 6:12 pm 
Pharaoh
Offline

Joined:Sat Mar 13, 2004 1:49 pm
Posts:914
Location: Long Beach, CA
I would love to see the question of Tut's relationships--his parents, his familial relationships--settled, but I don't really think DNA could do it. After all, the basic facts in DNA just tells us which family he came from--Amenhotep III's--if he had children--no--any physical reason for his death--no. Facts that we already know. Until a papyrus is discovered that tells us who his parents were, how and why he died, who his brothers and sisters might have been, we are still in the dark. And it's not likel;y that such a papyrus will be discovered.


Top
 Profile  
 

PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2005 6:46 pm 
Pharaoh
Offline

Joined:Mon May 09, 2005 9:22 am
Posts:574
Location: The palace of Tutness!
The only evidence I can think of that can link Tut and his family is a stele--I read this according to Nicholas Reeves' "The Complete Tutankhamun"--that said: "The king's own bodily son, his beloved, Tutankhaten". (The king, of course, being Akhenaten.). Which, might I add, was found in Akhetaten, in the North palace, I believe. ^_^ That's what I've read, but I think there should be more evidence on it. :?


Top
 Profile  
 

PostPosted: Mon May 16, 2005 11:50 am 
Pharaoh
Offline

Joined:Sat Mar 13, 2004 1:49 pm
Posts:914
Location: Long Beach, CA
I agree--the stele that was found spoke of "the king's own bodily son" and meaning Tutankhamen, but there is no mention of the king to which is being refered. If Amenhotep III had been his father, Tut would have refered to him as his bodily father. Actually, it was not unheard of for a king to refer to his ancestors as his "bodily father," as Tut had done in reference to Tuthmosis IV, his great-grandfather.


Top
 Profile  
 

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 78 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


  Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Style by web designer custom , optymalizacja seo pozycjonowanie stron pozycjonowanie
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group