But i now have 2 things to think of that happened to him. I just cant make up my min. The concussion or the charriot, The concussion or the charriot.

I've been translating the results of the scan of Tut...which can be also find here
http://www.guardians.net/hawass/press_r ... esults.htm

I think you should read it carefully....it tells a lot of things

1-he didn't die for a blow to his head, scientists have proven that the piece of bone has broken by the priests during the embalming process.
2- the sternum and ribs have been cut...so it is quite probable that it has been done by Carter's team while looking for artifacts of gold (which seemed to be their first aim!!)
3-Tut could not have died due to the break to the leg bone (this cannot cause death) and no sign of infection was detected in the soft tissues in the area, so he could not died for such an infection.
4- it is too quite probable that the boneof the leg was broken after his death, by Carter's team while trying to unglue the body from the coffin. Scientists found few remains of resins along the edges of the broken bones which, at first sight,made them think of the fact that it could happened a little before Tut's death, but then they soon realise that those resins where just few drops that could have fit the internal side of the fracture due to the fact that Carter's team used lamps to heat and unglue the body from the coffin, so the resins melted inside the edges of the fractured bone of the left leg.

So U dont believe it was murder? I do.

I didn't say that!
read carefully!

Is Carter's daughter still alive?

It's pretty obvious that Carter is dead now, due to the ravages of old age. But is his daughter still alive? If she were, she'd be in her eighties or nineties by now. I ask because she was there during the excavation - she was the first one to take pictures of the tomb, too! Perhaps she would be a valuable resource to say exactly what went on during the excavation?

It wasn't Carter's daughter, but Lord Carnarvon's, Lady Evelyn Herbert, who was present at the opening(s). Alas, she died in 1979 at age 78. Harry Burton, on loan from the Metropolitan Museum, took hundreds of photographs at different stages of the excavation. Many of these photos were published at the time and later collected and republished in book form.

regards,

Niankhkhnum

So what do u think happened to him?

.....did you finish the emoticons???

According to me he's been killed....but that's my own idea and stil there are no evidences of that or not. He could also have been poisoned...but we cannot make tests to established if this was the case or not.
So, every possibility is still opened.

The order of events and the succession to the throne following his death strongly suggest that Tut's demise was not an accident. How the deed was done is going to be almost impossible to prove, thanks to (among many others) Howard Carter and his crew.

Niankhkhnum

Yes I finished the emoticons..
But still one thing is that i know it is VERY important to find out what truely happened to King Tut. But i also htink everyone should stop take a breath and get ALL of the facts first. If they did that mabey it would come to them easy. If you agree with me post reply

But still no matter what i say he was Murderd. NO accident in this case to me Poor 18 year old.

No matter what, huh? Sounds like "My mind is made up, don't confuse me with facts." You may well be right, but you should let the facts dictate the conclusion, and not the other way around. Do you have all the facts? Do you think we do? If so, will we all get some kind of Psychic Flash and suddenly receive Illumination? Again, I think your theory may be a valid one, but it's still just that...a theory. What evidence have you uncovered in support of it?

Regards,

Niankhkhnum

I never said i was sure but i REALLY believe that he was murdered. I think that everyone has all these different ideas but fairly said they are all just theory's. I know that i will never know what really happened but still i know what i think happened. But i do know all the facts my brain could take on King Tut! But when it comes to the word facts who says all the things i read on the internet or something are true? I guess that is another thing i will never knw but still i know what i think and if some one will proove me wrong on one of my theorys then good i will think of an other one but i will allways think that he was murderd because the poor guy was 18 and fairly healthy.

and by the way i think the facts are a very IMPORTANT thing and i DONT get confused by them now.

That's not what the report says actually.



There is no agreement among the researchers. Some say that there may have been an infection. Others claim there wasn't.

The report doesn't say this, but a wound could cause "blood poisening" (I don't know what the english term is). This would not show up as an infection at the wound site, but is actually lethal. (I actually know someone who had something like this happen. On his arms you could only see scratches, but there was this bright red line on the interior of his arm. He needed medical treatment for this. In the old days I think this would have killed him.)

But you are right I think in pointing out that he still could have been poisened.

I thought it was rather interesting that the scans answered some questions and then turned right around and posed some more questions