Ancient Egyptian Forum Forum Index Ancient Egyptian Forum

 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 


Nefertiti's eyes

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Ancient Egyptian Forum Forum Index -> News
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Osiris II
Pharaoh


Joined: 13 Mar 2004
Posts: 914
Location: Long Beach, CA

PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 5:00 pm    Post subject: Nefertiti's eyes Reply with quote

A friend of mine who went to the recent ARCE conference was telling me about the lectures he had enjoyed. There was one in particular I found quite interesting. It was talking of the "oriental donward tilt" to be seen in Nefertiti's eyes, particularly noticable in the Berlin bust, a trait that seemed to be passed down to later generations. I honestly can say that I never noticed it before it was drawn to my attention, so after reading the article I checked--got an on-line photo of the bust. And sure enough, the inner corner of the eyes is turned down a bit. (even with the one eye missing, the socket is there)
If the mask above is one of her children or even of Tut the relationship is apparent, and if it IS Tut, his parental origins will have to be re-thought! His mother couldn't have been Kiya or Tiye, but must have been Nefertiti.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Google
Sponsor





PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2007 5:00 pm    Post subject: Advertisement

Back to top
egyptianscribe
Servant


Joined: 10 Apr 2007
Posts: 43
Location: Park Hills MO

PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2007 6:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
If the mask above is one of her children or even of Tut the relationship is apparent, and if it IS Tut, his parental origins will have to be re-thought! His mother couldn't have been Kiya or Tiye, but must have been Nefertiti.

In all the Amarna artwork its always Nefertiti and Akhenaten with their daughters, King Tut is never with them. Pointing towards the idea that King Tut was not the son of the queen but a son of another wife.
Quote:
downward tilt" to be seen in Nefertiti's eyes

Characteristic of seen in Amarna art
Kiya's and Tiye's eyes also have that characteristic


Kiya
More pics at:
Arrow http://www.homestead.com/wysinger/kiya.html
Tiye is mostly considered Tut's grandmother but she has similar features also.

_________________
egyptianscribe
To speak the name of the dead is to make them live again.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Osiris II
Pharaoh


Joined: 13 Mar 2004
Posts: 914
Location: Long Beach, CA

PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2007 2:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Citing the lack of the mention of Tut in connection with Akhenaten and Nefertiti artwork as proof that Tut was not the child of Nefertiti is, at its best, purt conjecture.
Many sons of Pharaoh who went on to become Pharaoh themselfves are not protrayed with their fathers, so a lack of his image does not prove anything at all!
Nefertiti's eyes, while having the downward tilt, also has a slightly heavier lid, typical of Asian features.
During the Amarna period, it seemed to be the artistic license to portray all eyes with a heavier, downturned eye--perhaps as a "compliment" to the queen, Nefertiti?
I personally believe Tut to be Ankhenaten's brother, a child of AIII and one of his wives. True, if so, he would have been born in AIII's old age, but such a thing happening is not impossible, especially if his mother was one of the younger wives.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
the_tutness_is_here
Pharaoh


Joined: 09 May 2005
Posts: 574
Location: The palace of Tutness!

PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 6:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

And it begins... Laughing *Smacks hands together and rubs them*

*Insert evil laugh here*

I believe Kiya to be the mother of both Tut and Smenkhare. Now, I know some folks believe that Smenkhare was Nefertiti-however!-recently they did a special on the National Geographic Channel about finding Kiya's mummy, which was next to Tiye's. They also did a CT scan (as with the other two) on a male skeleton they found...I think in KV55?

Hawass came to the conclusion that the skeleton could be Akhenaten, but then it could be Smenkhare. Yay conflict resolution, but anywho!

Whatever miracle test they could perform, if it turns out to be indeed Kiya and Smenkhare, they COULD-NOT saying they should-do what they did with Thutmosis I and Hatshepsut...DNA testing. From what I saw in that show it worked out well, and Hatshepsut was finally identified.

But I digress-I tend to do that a lot, smack me if I do it again-Akhenaten was never depicted with his father because of his older brother, Thutmose IV. Same with Tut-Smenkhare was heir to the throne, and so there were more reliefs of him than his little brother. (Be it Smenkhare himself or the Smenkhare-Nefertiti concoction, this was still the case).

But I am a firm believer in that Akhenaten had two sons, just as Amenhotep III did, and the older son dies, leaving the youngest son the throne of Egypt when he himself dies.

...I'm beginning to sense a pattern here...does no one else see it!? O_o

_________________
How does it FEEL to lose the one who understood you the MOST? He died to protect you, and YOU were supposed to protect HIM. What a shame...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
tnrees
Prince/Princess


Joined: 09 Jul 2005
Posts: 497
Location: Taunton, UK

PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

To go back to an earlier reply - many heirs were not depicted but why show only daughters and not the son?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Osiris II
Pharaoh


Joined: 13 Mar 2004
Posts: 914
Location: Long Beach, CA

PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 3:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't think the reason has ever been explained.
Many peoples in various civilizations have had an attitude very similar, though. It was thought to be bad luck, or to bring the male child's identity to the attention of the gods.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
madikata
Tomb Robber


Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 8:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting points. Hello to all of you, I am new to the forum Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
czarina
Tomb Robber


Joined: 22 Nov 2007
Posts: 3
Location: Michigan

PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 3:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:

In all the Amarna artwork its always Nefertiti and Akhenaten with their daughters, King Tut is never with them. Pointing towards the idea that King Tut was not the son of the queen but a son of another wife.


Though I agree that Tut was not Nefertiti's son, it was common for only the daughters to be shown in artwork and not the sons, because it symbolized fertility.

There are other examples of this. One that pops into my head is the bird hunting scene from Nebamun's tomb. He's with his daughter and wife, but his son's are not present.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tnrees
Prince/Princess


Joined: 09 Jul 2005
Posts: 497
Location: Taunton, UK

PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2007 12:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Did Nebamun have a son old enough to go hunting at the time the scene was painted?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mutnofret
Servant


Joined: 06 Jul 2008
Posts: 5

PostPosted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 10:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hmm... What comes to mind is that if a pharaoh had many sons, showing them in paintings and reliefs might have led to power struggle. Many different wives, many sons. There were cases of murdered pharaohs... We may not have heard of all the cases. Maat was important and stories of murdered pharaohs might have been kept secret from the people. To keep up the appearances, so to speak.

If one son or the people around him were very ambitious, and this son was picked up to be the heir, wasnīt there a chance that the father was eliminated so the son could ascend to the throne? Or perhaps the other sons might try to get rid of the chosen son so they would have a chance to get to the throne? This might have been one factor when it comes to showing the sons of the pharaoh in paintings?

How this relates to "ordinary" peopleīs tomb paintings, and the lack of sons there, I donīt know enough about the inheritance system of old Egypt to comment on that.

Just musing here...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Absorbedwyvern
Tomb Robber


Joined: 26 Apr 2008
Posts: 4
Location: N.S.W., Australia

PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2010 1:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wow.....
Nobody's been in here for ages! Surprised
_________________
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sotepenre
Servant


Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Posts: 17
Location: Akhetaten

PostPosted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 11:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Okay going back to the original post, I read a very interesting article that could be the last piece of the "ethnics debate". I forgot his name, but the egyptologist described how going back to Yuya, there could have been asiatic or Mittanian qualities. Like above average height, a beard but no mustache, and some of his titles. Like "Master of the horses." I don't know if this is true but the guy said Egypt didn't natrually have horses. So they got them from Mittani or a foreign asian country. Then another example is his daughter, the prominent Queen Tiye, writes back and forth with Tushratta over Akhenatens statues that were not entirelly solid gold. They were both super powers and yet in the Amarna Letters, they write to each other so casually. So it seems like some kind of relation ship. Also Mitanni people had the 'alien' shaped heads of the amarna royals. So I think Yuya is related like son or cousin or brother of Shuttarna. Then that would make Tiye a cousin or close blood relative of Tushratta. That is why the casual correspondence. Then Nefertiti being Aye's daughter (Aye is Tiye's brother) she has some foreign aspects. Also that could be why Mitanni gave over two princesses. (tadukhipa and gilukhipa) And for the "asiatic/mittanian features)

I would love some feed back on this. It is just an idea.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Ancient Egyptian Forum Forum Index -> News All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

Anti Bot Question MOD - phpBB MOD against Spam Bots
Blocked registrations / posts: 10373 / 0