| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
tnrees
Prince/Princess
Joined: 09 Jul 2005
Posts: 497
Location: Taunton, UK
|
 Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 12:34 pm Post subject: No comments on the new genetic work on Tut? |
 |
|
| They say they have identified a bone disease & malaria that might have contributed to Tuts death as well as working out a family tree on a group of mostly anonymous mummies. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Google
Sponsor
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 12:34 pm Post subject: Advertisement |
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kiya
Prince/Princess
Joined: 25 Sep 2002
Posts: 442
Location: Derby
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 5:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Yes im surprised no one else has commeneted on this. The show with the DNA testing was shown in the UK the other day. Don't know why they didn't try this a long time ago but they did leave one question not properly answered. The body they identified as Akhenaten was definitely the father of Tut and the son of Tiye and I think this is probably the most likely senario. We know from previous skull examinations on the body that it shared a first degree relationship with Tut meaning father and son or brother and brother. BUT! They didn't, for me at least, identify the mummy of Akhenaten beyong reasonable doubt. What if it was Smenkhare who would then have been Tuts father and a younger brother of Akhenaten. If you discount the Nefertiti is Smenkhare theory, would explain why Smenkhare preceeded Tut to the throne. Of course they may have thought Tut, at that point, too young to suceed if his father was Akhenaten. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tnrees
Prince/Princess
Joined: 09 Jul 2005
Posts: 497
Location: Taunton, UK
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 8:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have just finished watching the Zahi Hawass show (officially ‘King Tut Unwrapped’ on the discovery channel) that I videoed. I enjoyed it and got a lot of interesting information – he had a major problem with one of his feet – did it make him unsteady and break his leg? The program made some assertions which I do not see any support for.
It seems to have been a popular program – they sold a lot of advertising time.
I wonder what effect it will have on any Egyptologists who’s pet theory has been destroyed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kawab
Servant
Joined: 18 Feb 2009
Posts: 16
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 11:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Kiya wrote: | | Yes im surprised no one else has commeneted on this. The show with the DNA testing was shown in the UK the other day. Don't know why they didn't try this a long time ago but they did leave one question not properly answered. The body they identified as Akhenaten was definitely the father of Tut and the son of Tiye and I think this is probably the most likely senario. We know from previous skull examinations on the body that it shared a first degree relationship with Tut meaning father and son or brother and brother. BUT! They didn't, for me at least, identify the mummy of Akhenaten beyong reasonable doubt. What if it was Smenkhare who would then have been Tuts father and a younger brother of Akhenaten. If you discount the Nefertiti is Smenkhare theory, would explain why Smenkhare preceeded Tut to the throne. Of course they may have thought Tut, at that point, too young to suceed if his father was Akhenaten. |
That's probably because most of us are sick of the lies that spill out from Hawass and his team. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kawab
Servant
Joined: 18 Feb 2009
Posts: 16
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 4:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | would explain why Smenkhare preceeded Tut to the throne. |
Smenkhare did not precede Tut to the throne. He was Tut's older brother who 'died' before Akhenaten.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kiya
Prince/Princess
Joined: 25 Sep 2002
Posts: 442
Location: Derby
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 12:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Smenkhare did not precede Tut to the throne. He was Tut's older brother who 'died' before Akhenaten. |
Please do not assert this point as if it was accepted FACT! Your trying to contradict me with a assertion that isn't even true.
No one knows for certain Smenkhare was Tut's brother but we do know that someone called Smenkhare preceeded Tut on the throne ruling for approx three years whether or not Smenkhare was Tut's father, brother or Nefertiti in disguise. How much of this three years was spent in a co-regency with Akhenaten, if any, is anyone's guess but he didn't 'die' before Akhenaten. Check your facts before making unsubstantiated assertions like the above. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tnrees
Prince/Princess
Joined: 09 Jul 2005
Posts: 497
Location: Taunton, UK
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 12:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I think I have mentioned this before - There is another Smekhare - his statue is in quite a prominent positioin in the Cairo museum |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kawab
Servant
Joined: 18 Feb 2009
Posts: 16
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 5:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Kiya wrote: | | Quote: | | Smenkhare did not precede Tut to the throne. He was Tut's older brother who 'died' before Akhenaten. |
Please do not assert this point as if it was accepted FACT! Your trying to contradict me with a assertion that isn't even true.
No one knows for certain Smenkhare was Tut's brother but we do know that someone called Smenkhare preceeded Tut on the throne ruling for approx three years whether or not Smenkhare was Tut's father, brother or Nefertiti in disguise. How much of this three years was spent in a co-regency with Akhenaten, if any, is anyone's guess but he didn't 'die' before Akhenaten. Check your facts before making unsubstantiated assertions like the above. |
There is no need for you to be rude dear lady. I do not lie and I do know that what I said is true. Having the ability to communicate with spirit enables one to gain information that is true. Just because there is no evidence yet found in the physical realm, does not mean certain things to be true.
The Smenkhare I refer to was the older brother of Tutankhamun but he did not live long enough to take the throne, not even as co-regent. I'm sorry if you do not believe me but you have your right to what you believe as I have mine. I do not feel it is fair to attack me verbally.
I would very much like to see the evidence that Smenkhare became pharaoh after Akhenaten and before Tutankhamun if you would be so kind.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sotepenre
Servant
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Posts: 17
Location: Akhetaten
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 10:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kawab guy, cool it, okay?
I found the King Tut Unwrapped show very intersting.
Okay so one day my Mom gave me a snippet of newspaper from my grandma to me and it talked about some mummies found. I screamed and yelled and went straight to the computer. I pulled up Hawass' website and it was true. Akhenaten, Tiye, Tut's mom, Ankhesenpaaten, and Kv 21 B !I was so happy! I danced and my heart was beating so fast!!!!  Sorry, but that was a true story. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ramessesthepharaoh
Tomb Robber
Joined: 08 Feb 2010
Posts: 3
|
| Posted: Mon Mar 29, 2010 8:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Sotepenre wrote: | Kawab guy, cool it, okay?
I found the King Tut Unwrapped show very intersting.
Okay so one day my Mom gave me a snippet of newspaper from my grandma to me and it talked about some mummies found. I screamed and yelled and went straight to the computer. I pulled up Hawass' website and it was true. Akhenaten, Tiye, Tut's mom, Ankhesenpaaten, and Kv 21 B !I was so happy! I danced and my heart was beating so fast!!!! Sorry, but that was a true story. |
Sotepenre, why do you feel the need to show annoyance at people who do not share your views on certain subjects? As I understand it, Kawab was merely responding to another member's post and stating his reasons for doing so. Was there really any need for you to respond with 'Kawab guy, cool it okay?'
From what I can see here on this board, there is very little activity at present and I would think the staff would like it to pick up but comments like yours are not really displaying encouraging vibrations to other new members, are they?
It would be nice if there was more activity here, & posting some interesting topics for discussion but refraining from picking fault with those of differing opinions would, I think, be more productive & encouraging to other members.
There will always be people who do not share our opinions on various things but there are times when disgression is best - a time to keep quiet. This avoids ill feelings. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
