Ancient Egyptian Forum

[Ankhesenamun_1]

I think Ay did, but it's suspicious that Horemheb made his lifelong goal to erase all records of Tutankhamen .

I also definitely don't think that Ankhesenamun did because why would she, really? She seemed like such a loving wife AND she knew that she probably would be forced into marrying someone old like Ay. The only reason ppl think she's a major suspect is because she was with Tut all the time, and therefore would have been able to sneak up on him and know his weaknesses. Even so, I firmly believe that Ankhesenamun was not the murderer. And who knows, the recent evidence that points to King Tut in fact NOT being murdered, rather dying of an infection in a broken leg might be true. I don't know, I personally believe that he was murdered more because it is interesting AND Ay did seem to really want to take over the throne. But whatever the case was, I do staunchly believe (and hope) that it was NOT Ankhesenamun.

[Google]

[nileqt87]

broken leg--

me thinks chariot accident.

[Unas]

I used to believe it was a close royal comrade; but since then, I have learned of his sickly disposition, so I believe it was bad genes.
_________________
"Does anyone ever truly think 'outside' of the box, or are they merely expanding the possibilities of what that box can hold to suit their own agenda?"
(Piquet: Nov. 3, 2005)

[Hatshepsut76]

According to the opinions I read, I realize that more or less the opinion on Tut's death are the same: Ankhesenamon didn't kill him. That's okay, I can agree with it. 'Til now I heard of a chariot accident, that could be true... But now a new hypotesis rose on my mind: let's suppose that Ay tambered the chariot with... could it be possible? I don't think it could be impossible...

[Ankhesenamun_1]

[the_tutness_is_here]